gnso

Constituencies blast ICANN’s “closed door” Verisign .com contract renewal

Groups want explanation for lack of thick whois in contract. Three ICANN entities have signed a letter ( pdf ) blasting ICANN for its “closed doors” decision to renew the .com agreement with Verisign without requiring thick whois.

By |August 21st, 2012|Recent Domain News|Comments Off

Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Working Group Publishes its Initial Report

The GNSO Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery (PEDNR) Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group has published its Initial Report .

By |June 1st, 2010|Recent Domain News|0 Comments

Webinar Surveys Whois Requirements

In May last year, the GNSO Council tasked Policy Staff to collect and organize a comprehensive set of requirements for the Whois service.

By |April 12th, 2010|Recent Domain News|0 Comments

ICANN releases the second status report to the GNSO council on AGP limits policy implementation

ICANN has recently releases its second status report to the GNSO council on AGP limits policy implementation.

By |December 17th, 2009|Recent Domain News|0 Comments

ICANN Board Appoints New GNSO Council Members

At its 30 September Board meeting, the ICANN Board of Directors appointed three individuals to serve as Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG) representatives on the new Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council.

By |October 12th, 2009|Recent Domain News|0 Comments

Public Comment:Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery

The Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Working Group that was launched following the adoption of its charter by the GNSO Council on 24 June 2009 is requesting people input to inform its deliberations to answer many questions.

By |August 24th, 2009|Recent Domain News|0 Comments